Upfront Gamma Knife radiosurgery alone for brain metastases: the prognostic value of DS-GPA and RPA.





Keywords: grading system, brain metastasis, gamma knife, radiosurgery, outcome

Interactive Manuscript

Ask Questions of this Manuscript:

   



Abstract

     Grading systems are valuable for the study of brain metastases outcomes.
     We sought to validate Diagnosis Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (DS-GPA), a new prognostic index that takes into account histology of the primary, and RTOG Recursive Partitioning Analysis (RPA) system using a single institution database of patients treated with initial radiosurgery (SRS) alone for brain metastases (BM).
     224 patients were treated using Leksell Gamma Knife and 28 using LINAC-based delivery.
     We retrospectively identified adult patients who underwent SRS at our institution for upfront treatment of BM between 2009 and 2010 but excluded those who underwent previous craniotomy and/or WBRT (n=252).  The population was grouped into DS-GPA 0-0.5 (n=19), 1 (n=46), 1.5 (n=52), 2 (n=67), and ?2.5 (n=63). The same patients were also grouped by RPA class: 1 (n=24), 2 (n=212), and 3 (n=10). Most common histologies were non-small cell lung cancer (34%), melanoma (30%), and breast carcinoma (16%). Median number was 2 (range: 1-13) and median total tumor volume was 0.9 cm3 (range 0.3-22.9 cm3). Median dose was 20 Gy (range 15-25 Gy). SRS was used as sole management (62% of patients), or in combination with salvage treatment with SRS (22%), WBRT (13%) or neurosurgery (3%). Median follow-up was 7.5 months.
     Median overall survival (OS) was 11.1 months. Median survival times were 4.0 months for DS-GPA 0–0.5, 5.6 months for DS-GPA 1, 8.1 months for DS-GPA 1.5, 21.5 months for DS-GPA 2, and 30 months for DS-GPA?2.5 (p<0.0001). In the RPA groups, median OS was not reached for class 1, was 10.8 months for class 2, and 2.8 months for class 3 (p<0.0001). Neither RPA, nor DS-GPA was prognostic for local control or new lesion-free survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that age > 60, KPS?80, and uncontrolled primary disease were significant adverse prognostic factors for OS.
     This was a retrospective evaluation.
     When applied to patients treated with upfront SRS for newly diagnosed BM, RPA and DS-GPA indices prove to be valid, splitting patients into prognostically different groups. Application of DS-GPA to patients treated with SRS provides additional prognostic refinement over that provided by the RPA. 
     DS-GPA may allow for selection of treatment modality based on predicted patient outcome.


Acknowledgements

Project Roles: